>>click to enlarge<<
development of opal
grown opal
grown opal
synthetic opals
SYNTHETIC & IMITATION OPAL

Synthetic Opal

There is some doubt that a true synthetic opal of gem quality has been made, although stones have been made which are very similar in composition and properties. Essential to this must be the internal structure of close packed spheres which cause the development of colour by diffraction of the incident light beam.

Some of the earliest attempts to make synthetic opal were carried out in the Melbourne CSIRO laboratories under the direction of A.J. Gaskin. Once it was known that precious opal was built up of minute spheres of silica (R0362), it was a short step to the realisation that this structure could be duplicated by polymerisation of silica sols of appropriate composition to form silica spheres of appropriate size, with subsequent settling into a regularly packed form. This was achieved without much difficulty, as the behaviour of these sols was well known from the work of Iler (R0338). Opal-like silica showing the same diffraction colours as natural opal was produced, but difficulty was encountered when trying to dry the material to an acceptable hard product. The synthetic material invariably cracked and turned milky.

Most of these difficulties appeared to have been solved by Pierre Gilson of Switzerland, who produced opals remarkably like natural materials, ranging from transparent, through milky to black opals. The stones were very attractive, stable, and could be made as cabochons or triplets. When mounted, many of the stones which had a similar pattern to the natural material could pass as natural to the non-professional. However, careful examination of the stones showed small differences. For example, the boundaries between colour patches tend to be straight in the natural stone, while they are crenulated in the Gilson material. This is in part caused by the curious mosaic pattern seen within the colour patches, and termed the 'lizard skin' effect.

Detailed work on the Gilson stones by Schmetzer et al (R1009, R1631) has shown that many, if not most of them, differ somewhat from the natural opal. Many contain a small amount of zirconium oxide, the function of which is not fully understood, and some contain little or no water. These differences would therefore put some, if not most of the Gilson material into the category of 'artificial' opal. Jobbins et al (R1630) have also studied the structures to be found in Gilson opal using optical microscopy, and have described in detail how they may be identified. Nevertheless, the Gilson product is the nearest, and certainly the best, commercial artificial opal yet to be made.

Some remarkable experiments have been carried out by Mr Len Cram, of Lightning Ridge. He has produced opaline material by long term reaction of natural materials with other substances in glass jars. This is undoubtedly the closest simulation of the growth of opal yet to be achieved.